- Masengeli’s conduct, redolent of the worst excesses of autocratic regimes, serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of our democratic institutions.
- It behooves every citizen, every officer of the court, and every public servant who holds dear the principles of constitutionalism to stand in solidarity with our beleaguered judges.
- The judiciary, as the guardian of our constitutional order, must be accorded the respect and deference commensurate with its vital role in our democracy.
As postulated in the seminal work “The Rule of Law” by Tom Bingham (2010), the inviolability of judicial independence stands as a cornerstone of democratic governance and the rule of law.
It is against this backdrop that we must scrutinise and vehemently repudiate the egregious transgressions perpetrated by one Gilbert Masengeli, the Acting Inspector General of Police, whose actions have precipitated a constitutional crisis of unprecedented magnitude.
The recent malfeasance exhibited by the aforementioned Masengeli represents an unparalleled assault on the sacrosanct principles of judicial autonomy and constitutional supremacy.
His recalcitrant defiance of no less than seven judicial summonses, culminating in a six-month incarceration for contempt, epitomizes a pernicious erosion of the very foundations upon which our legal edifice is constructed.
This flagrant disregard for judicial authority not only contravenes the explicit provisions of Article 160 of the Kenyan Constitution but also undermines the fundamental tenets of separation of powers as elucidated by Montesquieu in his magnum opus “The Spirit of the Laws.”
In a display of unmitigated hubris and constitutional illiteracy, Masengeli did not only abdicate his sworn duty to uphold the rule of law but also embarked upon a quixotic crusade to emasculate the judiciary through puerile acts of retribution.
His specious assertion regarding the withdrawal of security provisions for Justice Lawrence Mugambi, predicated on a risible interpretation of constitutional mandates, betrays a profound ignorance of both legal precedent and the basic principles of governance.
This meretricious argument, bereft of any jurisprudential merit, serves only to underscore the intellectual bankruptcy of those who would seek to subvert our constitutional order.
The implications of Masengeli’s actions extend far beyond the realm of mere administrative malfeasance; they strike at the very heart of our democratic institutions.
By wilfully flouting judicial directives and engaging in transparent attempts at intimidation, he has effectively declared war on the independence of the judiciary.
This brazen assault on the third arm of government represents nothing less than a coup d’état against the constitutional order, executed not with tanks and troops, but with the insidious weapons of bureaucratic obstruction and executive overreach.
It is a matter of profound irony that an individual charged with the maintenance of law and order should become the very embodiment of lawlessness and disorder.
Masengeli’s conduct, redolent of the worst excesses of autocratic regimes, serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of our democratic institutions.
His actions have not only brought opprobrium upon the office he occupies but have also cast a long shadow over the integrity of Kenya’s entire law enforcement apparatus.
The judiciary, as the ultimate bulwark against tyranny and injustice, must not be left to weather this storm alone.
It behooves every citizen, every officer of the court, and every public servant who holds dear the principles of constitutionalism to stand in solidarity with our beleaguered judges.
To remain silent in the face of such egregious overreach is to be complicit in the erosion of the very liberties we purport to cherish.
Let it be known to Masengeli and his ilk that their Machiavellian machinations will not go unchallenged.
The Constitution, that living document which enshrines our collective aspirations and safeguards our fundamental rights, will indeed have the last laugh.
For in the annals of history, it is not the petty tyrants and bureaucratic bullies who are remembered with reverence, but those who stood firm in defense of justice and the rule of law.
As we navigate these turbulent waters, we would do well to heed the prescient words of Justice Robert H. Jackson, who in his dissenting opinion in Korematsu v. United States (1944) warned that “once judicial approval is given to such conduct… the principle then lies about like a loaded weapon, ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need.” The current crisis serves as a stark reminder of the perennial vigilance required to safeguard our constitutional liberties.
The audacity with which Masengeli has sought to undermine judicial authority is matched only by the poverty of his legal reasoning.
His specious arguments, bereft of any constitutional foundation, serve as a testament to the dangers of entrusting power to those who lack even a rudimentary understanding of the legal framework within which they are meant to operate.
It is a damning indictment of our system that such an individual could ascend to a position of such authority.
In the face of such blatant disregard for constitutional norms, we must not allow ourselves to be cowed into silence.
The judiciary, as the guardian of our constitutional order, must be accorded the respect and deference commensurate with its vital role in our democracy. Any attempt to diminish its authority or impugn its integrity must be met with the full force of legal and moral opprobrium.
To those who would seek to interfere with judicial independence, let this serve as an unequivocal warning: your efforts are doomed to failure. The Constitution, that indomitable bulwark against tyranny and injustice, will prevail.
The principles of judicial autonomy and the rule of law are not mere abstractions to be discarded at the whim of petty autocrats; they are the very lifeblood of our democratic society.
As we contemplate the gravity of the current situation, we are reminded of the words of Chief Justice Warren Burger, who in his seminal work “Delivery of Justice” (1990) opined that “Judges, like Caesar’s wife, must be above suspicion.” It is incumbent upon all branches of government to ensure that this ideal is not merely aspired to, but zealously protected and rigorously upheld.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Honour, Duty, and Justice: Pillars of credible governance in Kenya
In conclusion, the actions of Acting Inspector General Gilbert Masengeli stand as a stark reminder of the fragility of our constitutional order and the ever-present threat of executive overreach.
As we navigate this constitutional crisis, let us be guided by the wisdom of our forebears and the unwavering commitment to justice that has long been the hallmark of our legal tradition.
For in the end, it is not through the machinations of petty bureaucrats that the arc of history bends, but through the collective will of a people determined to uphold the principles of justice, equality, and the rule of law.
The writer is a lawyer and legal researcher
