- We can prolong life through medicine or safeguard it through caution, but the moment of departure is dictated by forces beyond us.
- This radical view suggests that while we cannot dictate our natural death, the only true act of defiance against fate is choosing one’s own end—a controversial stance that challenges the passive acceptance of mortality.
- While we may shape the path of our lives, we do not decide when our journey ends. Whether one views death as an existential certainty, a predetermined fate, or an act of divine will, the reality remains: our time is not ours to schedule.
Human existence is marked by an inherent paradox: while we often believe we have control over our lives, the final moment—our death—remains beyond our command. The inevitability of death, and our inability to dictate its timing, raises profound questions about free will, fate, and the meaning of life.
The Limits of Human Control and the Inevitability of Death
The Stoic philosopher Epictetus reminds us:
“You may fetter my leg, but not even Zeus has the power to break my freedom of choice.”
While we can exercise choice in how we live, the ultimate boundary—our mortality—remains outside our will. We can prolong life through medicine or safeguard it through caution, but the moment of departure is dictated by forces beyond us.
Martin Heidegger, in Being and Time, describes human existence as Sein-zum-Tode (Being-toward-death). He argues that the awareness of our inevitable death gives meaning to life. Death is not an event we schedule; it is an ever-present possibility shaping our existence. As he puts it, “As soon as man comes to life, he is at once old enough to die.”
Fate vs. Free Will: Are We Masters of Our Own End?
William Shakespeare explores this dilemma through Julius Caesar’s reflection:
“Death, a necessary end, will come when it will come.”
This suggests that despite human agency, there are forces—be it fate, divine will, or natural law—that ultimately decide when our time is up.
The ancient Greeks viewed fate (Moira) as an inescapable force, even binding the gods themselves. Sophocles, in Oedipus Rex, illustrates how attempts to outrun fate only lead one to fulfill it. Oedipus, in trying to avoid his prophesied doom, paradoxically walks straight into it. This reinforces the idea that we do not choose when our time is up—it is already woven into the fabric of existence.
The Existentialist Perspective: The Absurdity of Time and Death
Albert Camus, in The Myth of Sisyphus, argues that life’s absurdity stems from our awareness of death. We live as though we control time, yet the reality is that time controls us. As Camus puts it:
“There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide.”
This radical view suggests that while we cannot dictate our natural death, the only true act of defiance against fate is choosing one’s own end—a controversial stance that challenges the passive acceptance of mortality.
The Religious Perspective: Divine Will and Predestination
Religious traditions often frame death as an act of divine will rather than human choice. Islamic philosophy teaches that “No soul will die except by Allah’s permission at a decreed time” (Qur’an 3:145). Similarly, Christianity holds that “To everything there is a season… a time to be born, and a time to die” (Ecclesiastes 3:1-2).
The Bhagavad Gita reinforces this idea with Krishna’s words:
“Death is certain for the born, and rebirth is certain for the dead; therefore, you should not grieve over the inevitable.”
This suggests that the timing of our departure is already set, beyond human control.
Conclusion: The Mystery of Our Final Hour
While we may shape the path of our lives, we do not decide when our journey ends. Whether one views death as an existential certainty, a predetermined fate, or an act of divine will, the reality remains: our time is not ours to schedule.
Perhaps Søren Kierkegaard best encapsulates this paradox:
“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.”
We do not choose when our time is up, but we can choose how we live in the time we are given.
YOU MAY ALSO READ: BOOK REVIEW: The Patch Theorem: A Philosophy of Death, Life and Time
